Skip to main content
Helikon Labs

← All glossary terms

Glossary · Evaluate

Portfolio manager (R&D)

An R&D portfolio manager decides, with the leadership team, which projects and programs get funded, continued, or stopped, so that the whole set serves the company's strategy.

How it works in a university-industry collaboration

PMI defines a portfolio as programs, projects, and operations "managed as a group to maximize overall value delivery and achieve strategic objectives" (PMBOK Guide, eighth edition). In R&D, the portfolio review runs alongside the stage-gate: the gate decides on one project, and the portfolio review balances all of them. In a study of industry practice, Cooper, Edgett, and Kleinschmidt found financial methods were the most popular way to choose projects but performed worst, and the best performers leaned more on strategic and scoring methods (R&D Management, 2001).

For a university partnership, the portfolio manager is often the person who decides whether it keeps its funding next year, and often isn't in the project meetings. Bring them evidence, not just enthusiasm. A quarterly health check is a good start.

Translation Box: portfolio manager

On the academic side: rarely a title. The nearest equivalents are a center director balancing several grants, or the tech transfer office managing a patent portfolio.

On the industry side: a defined role in R&D leadership or the project management office. In finance, the same title means an investment manager, a different job entirely.

What Helikon does with it

On the Pro plan, the Partnership Pipeline exports to CSV, so a portfolio manager can bring every university partnership into their own review.

Sources

  • Project Management Institute, 2025, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), eighth edition, ANSI/PMI 99-001-2025, Glossary. www.pmi.org/standards/pmbok
  • Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J. and Kleinschmidt, E. J., 2001, Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study, R&D Management 31(4), 361-380. doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00225

Related